Intel HD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
What is the difference between Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA Quadro P400. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 312 | 3DMark Time Spy | 706 |
| 142 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 237 |
| 823 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 1964 |
| 338 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 933 |
| 196 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 382 |
| 2018 | 3DMark Wild Life | 4407 |
| 540 | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1285 |
| 3052 | 3DMark Night Raid | 8612 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Kaby Lake GT2 | GPU Name | GP107 |
| Generation 9.5 | Architecture | Pascal |
| Intel | Foundry | Samsung |
| 14 nm++ | Process Size | 14 nm |
| unknown | Transistors | 3,300 million |
| unknown | Die Size | 132 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2017 |
| HD Graphics-M (Kaby Lake) | Family | Quadro (Px000) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| Ring Bus | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| System Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| System Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System Shared | Memory Bus | 64 bit |
| System Dependent | Bandwidth | 32.06 GB/s |
Performance
| 2.550 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.03 GPixel/s |
| 20.40 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 20.03 GTexel/s |
| 652.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 10.02 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| 326.4 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 641.0 GFLOPS |
| 81.60 GFLOPS (1:4) | FP64 (double) performance | 20.03 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 300 MHz | Base Clock | 1228 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Boost Clock | 1252 MHz |
| System Shared | Memory Clock | 1002 MHz 4 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 192 | Shading Units | 256 |
| 24 | TMUs | 16 |
| 3 | ROPs | 16 |
Board Design
| IGP | Slot Width | Single-slot |
| 5 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 30 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.4 | Shader Model | 6.4 |