NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and NVIDIA Tesla C2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GT200 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Tesla 2.0 | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 1,400 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 576 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Sep 16th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| GeForce 200 | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 896 MB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 448 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 111.9 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 16.13 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 41.47 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 536.5 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| 67.07 GFLOPS (1:8) | FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 999 MHz 1998 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 576 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 216 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 72 | TMUs | 64 |
| 28 | ROPs | 48 |
| 224 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 27 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 267 mm 10.5 inches | Length | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| 182 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| 450 W | Suggested PSU | 600 W |
| 2x DVI 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 1.3 | CUDA | 2.0 |