NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
What is the difference between NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and NVIDIA Tesla M2050. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GF110 | GPU Name | GF100 |
| Fermi 2.0 | Architecture | Fermi |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 40 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 3,000 million | Transistors | 3,100 million |
| 520 mm² | Die Size | 529 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Jul 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| Tesla (x20xx) | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 384 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 150.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 148.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 16.07 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 16.10 GPixel/s |
| 32.14 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 32.20 GTexel/s |
| 1,028 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,030 GFLOPS |
| 513.9 GFLOPS (1:2) | FP64 (double) performance | 515.2 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 783 MHz 3.1 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 773 MHz 3.1 Gbps effective |
| 574 MHz | GPU Clock | 575 MHz |
Render Config
| 448 | Shading Units | 448 |
| 56 | TMUs | 56 |
| 48 | ROPs | 48 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) |
| 768 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 14 | SM Count | 14 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 248 mm 9.8 inches | Length | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| 247 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 225 W |
| 550 W | Suggested PSU | 550 W |
| 1x DVI | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support
| 12 (11_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 2.0 | CUDA | 2.0 |