NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| TU102 | GPU Name | GV100 |
| Turing | Architecture | Volta |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18,600 million | Transistors | 21,100 million |
| 754 mm² | Die Size | 815 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 26th, 2019 |
| Quadro (Tx000) | Family | Tesla (Vxx) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| 48 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 384 bit | Memory Bus | 4096 bit |
| 672.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1,133 GB/s |
Performance
| 169.9 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 195.8 GPixel/s |
| 509.8 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 489.6 GTexel/s |
| 32.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 31.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| 16.31 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 15.67 TFLOPS |
| 509.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | FP64 (double) performance | 7.834 TFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 1395 MHz | Base Clock | 1312 MHz |
| 1770 MHz | Boost Clock | 1530 MHz |
| 1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1106 MHz 2.2 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 4608 | Shading Units | 5120 |
| 288 | TMUs | 320 |
| 96 | ROPs | 128 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 128 KB (per SM) |
| 6 MB | L2 Cache | 6 MB |
| 72 | SM Count | 80 |
| 576 | Tensor Cores | 640 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 260 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| 600 W | Suggested PSU | 600 W |
| 4x DisplayPort 1x USB Type-C | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
API support
| 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.6 | Shader Model | 6.6 |
| 7.5 | CUDA | 7.0 |