NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro CX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GT200B | GPU Name | GT200B |
| Tesla 2.0 | Architecture | Tesla 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 55 nm | Process Size | 55 nm |
| 1,400 million | Transistors | 1,400 million |
| 470 mm² | Die Size | 470 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Nov 11th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 11th, 2008 |
| Quadro CX | Family | Quadro FX (x800) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| 1,999 USD | Launch Price | 1,799 USD |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 1536 MB | Memory Size | 1536 MB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR3 |
| 384 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 76.80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 76.80 GB/s |
Performance
| 14.45 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 14.45 GPixel/s |
| 38.53 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 38.53 GTexel/s |
| 462.3 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 462.3 GFLOPS |
| 57.79 GFLOPS (1:8) | FP64 (double) performance | 57.79 GFLOPS (1:8) |
Clock Speeds
| 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
| 602 MHz | GPU Clock | 602 MHz |
Render Config
| 192 | Shading Units | 192 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 24 | ROPs | 24 |
| 192 KB | L2 Cache | 192 KB |
| 24 | SM Count | 24 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 267 mm 10.5 inches | Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches |
| 150 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 150 W |
| 450 W | Suggested PSU | 450 W |
| 1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | 2x DVI 1x S-Video |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 3.3 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 4.0 |
| 1.3 | CUDA | 1.3 |