NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro CX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
GT200B | GPU Name | GT200B |
Tesla 2.0 | Architecture | Tesla 2.0 |
TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
55 nm | Process Size | 55 nm |
1,400 million | Transistors | 1,400 million |
470 mm² | Die Size | 470 mm² |
Graphics Card
Nov 11th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
Quadro CX | Family | Quadro FX (x800) |
End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
1,999 USD | Launch Price | 799 USD |
PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
1536 MB | Memory Size | 1024 MB |
GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR3 |
384 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
76.80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s |
Performance
14.45 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 9.600 GPixel/s |
38.53 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 38.40 GTexel/s |
462.3 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 462.3 GFLOPS |
57.79 GFLOPS (1:8) | FP64 (double) performance | 57.79 GFLOPS (1:8) |
Clock Speeds
800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
602 MHz | GPU Clock | 600 MHz |
Render Config
192 | Shading Units | 192 |
64 | TMUs | 64 |
24 | ROPs | 16 |
192 KB | L2 Cache | 128 KB |
24 | SM Count | 24 |
Board Design
Dual-slot | Slot Width | Single-slot |
267 mm 10.5 inches | Length | 198 mm 7.8 inches |
150 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 108 W |
450 W | Suggested PSU | 300 W |
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | 1x DVI 2x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
P607 | Board Number | P755 |
API support
11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) |
3.3 | OpenGL | 3.3 |
1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
4.0 | Shader Model | 4.0 |
1.3 | CUDA | 1.3 |