NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 676 | PassMark G3D | 972 |
| 246 | PassMark G2D | 128 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| G92 | GPU Name | GT200B |
| Tesla | Architecture | Tesla 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 55 nm |
| 754 million | Transistors | 1,400 million |
| 324 mm² | Die Size | 470 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Feb 1st, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 11th, 2008 |
| GeForce 200M | Family | Quadro FX (x800) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| MXM-B (3.0) | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 1024 MB | Memory Size | 1536 MB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR3 |
| 256 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 64.00 GB/s | Bandwidth | 76.80 GB/s |
Performance
| 9.600 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 14.45 GPixel/s |
| 38.40 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 38.53 GTexel/s |
| 384.0 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 462.3 GFLOPS |
Clock Speeds
| 1000 MHz 2 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
| 600 MHz | GPU Clock | 602 MHz |
Render Config
| 128 | Shading Units | 192 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 16 | ROPs | 24 |
| 64 KB | L2 Cache | 192 KB |
| 16 | SM Count | 24 |
Board Design
| MXM Module | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 75 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 150 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | 1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 3.3 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 4.0 |
| 1.1 | CUDA | 1.3 |