NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro CX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 947 | PassMark G3D | 676 |
| 454 | PassMark G2D | 246 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GT200B | GPU Name | G92 |
| Tesla 2.0 | Architecture | Tesla |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 55 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
| 1,400 million | Transistors | 754 million |
| 470 mm² | Die Size | 324 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Nov 11th, 2008 | Release Date | Feb 1st, 2010 |
| Quadro CX | Family | GeForce 200M |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory
| 1536 MB | Memory Size | 1024 MB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR3 |
| 384 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 76.80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 64.00 GB/s |
Performance
| 14.45 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 9.600 GPixel/s |
| 38.53 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 38.40 GTexel/s |
| 462.3 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 384.0 GFLOPS |
Clock Speeds
| 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 1000 MHz 2 Gbps effective |
| 602 MHz | GPU Clock | 600 MHz |
Render Config
| 192 | Shading Units | 128 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 24 | ROPs | 16 |
| 192 KB | L2 Cache | 64 KB |
| 24 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 150 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 W |
| 1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 3.3 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 4.0 |
| 1.3 | CUDA | 1.1 |