NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 3661 | 3DMark Time Spy | 2892 |
| 1674 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 1339 |
| 8137 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 7937 |
| 4021 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 4168 |
| 1854 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 2301 |
| 26795 | 3DMark Night Raid | 17840 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| TU117 | GPU Name | GM204 |
| TU117-300-A1 | Model number | N16E-Q5-A1 |
| Turing | Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| 4,700 million | Transistors | 5,200 million |
| 200 mm² | Die Size | 398 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 | Family | Quadro Mobile (Mx000M) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 62.40 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 93.60 GTexel/s |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 2.995 TFLOPS |
| 93.24 GFLOPS (1:32) | FP64 (double) performance | 93.60 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 2001 MHz 8 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1253 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 896 | Shading Units | 1536 |
| 56 | TMUs | 96 |
| 32 | ROPs | 64 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 48 KB (per SMM) |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 2 MB |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 75 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 W |
| 1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.1 |
| 6.6 | Shader Model | 6.4 |
| 7.5 | CUDA | 5.2 |