NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 6244 | PassMark G3D | 6715 |
| 335 | PassMark G2D | 457 |
| 3258 | 3DMark Time Spy | 2511 |
| 7769 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 7046 |
| 3797 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 3604 |
| 1813 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 1982 |
| 22025 | 3DMark Night Raid | 15241 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| TU117 | GPU Name | GM204 |
| N18P-G62 | Model number | N16E-Q3-A1 |
| Turing | Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| 4,700 million | Transistors | 5,200 million |
| 200 mm² | Die Size | 398 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Family | Quadro Mobile (Mx000M) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 160.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 38.40 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 62.40 GPixel/s |
| 76.80 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 78.00 GTexel/s |
| 2.458 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| 76.80 GFLOPS (1:32) | FP64 (double) performance | 78.00 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1253 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 1024 | Shading Units | 1280 |
| 64 | TMUs | 80 |
| 32 | ROPs | 64 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 48 KB (per SMM) |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 2 MB |
Board Design
| 50 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.1 |
| 6.6 | Shader Model | 6.4 |
| 7.5 | CUDA | 5.2 |