NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA Tesla C2090 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GF110 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Fermi 2.0 | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 40 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 3,000 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 520 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Jul 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| Tesla (x20xx) | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 384 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 177.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 20.83 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 41.66 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 1,332 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) | FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 651 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 512 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 48 | ROPs | 48 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) |
| 768 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 16 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 248 mm 9.8 inches | Length | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| 250 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| 600 W | Suggested PSU | 600 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (11_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 2.0 | CUDA | 2.0 |