AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 Nano and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 4801 | 3DMark Time Spy | 7391 |
| 2282 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 3449 |
| 12494 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 16199 |
| 6884 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 9063 |
| 3726 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 4624 |
| 32764 | 3DMark Wild Life | 38608 |
| 10520 | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 14950 |
| 30500 | 3DMark Night Raid | 27011 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Fiji | GPU Name | TU104 |
| GCN 3.0 | Architecture | Turing |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 28 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 8,900 million | Transistors | 13,600 million |
| 596 mm² | Die Size | 545 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 27th, 2019 |
| Pirate Islands (R9 300) | Family | Quadro Mobile (Tx000) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 512.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s |
Performance
| 64.00 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| 256.0 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS (1:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 16.59 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| 512.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | FP64 (double) performance | 259.2 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 500 MHz 1000 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 4096 | Shading Units | 3072 |
| 256 | TMUs | 192 |
| 64 | ROPs | 64 |
| 16 KB (per CU) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) |
| 2 MB | L2 Cache | 4 MB |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | IGP |
| 175 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 80 W |
| 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
API support
| 12 (12_0) | DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 2.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.3 | Shader Model | 6.6 |