AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
What is the difference between AMD Radeon R7 250X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Cape Verde | GPU Name | GT200B |
| Cape Verde XT | Model number | G200-835-B2 |
| GCN 1.0 | Architecture | Tesla 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 28 nm | Process Size | 55 nm |
| 1,500 million | Transistors | 1,400 million |
| 123 mm² | Die Size | 470 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Family | Quadro FX (x800) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| 99 USD | Launch Price | 799 USD |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 1024 MB | Memory Size | 1024 MB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR3 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 256 bit |
| 72.00 GB/s | Bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s |
Performance
| 15.20 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 9.600 GPixel/s |
| 38.00 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 38.40 GTexel/s |
| 1,216 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 462.3 GFLOPS |
| 76.00 GFLOPS (1:16) | FP64 (double) performance | 57.79 GFLOPS (1:8) |
Clock Speeds
| 1125 MHz 4.5 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
| 950 MHz | GPU Clock | 600 MHz |
Render Config
| 640 | Shading Units | 192 |
| 40 | TMUs | 64 |
| 16 | ROPs | 16 |
| 256 KB | L2 Cache | 128 KB |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Single-slot |
| 210 mm 8.3 inches | Length | 198 mm 7.8 inches |
| 80 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 108 W |
| 250 W | Suggested PSU | 300 W |
| 1x DVI 1x HDMI 2x mini-DisplayPort | Display Connectors | 1x DVI 2x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
| C441, C698 | Board Number | P755 |
API support
| 12 (11_1) | DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 3.3 |
| 1.2 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | N/A |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 4.0 |