Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
What is the difference between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA Quadro M2000. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 1436 | 3DMark Time Spy | 1703 |
| 690 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 737 |
| 4039 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 4752 |
| 2058 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 2397 |
| 1110 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 1141 |
| 10621 | 3DMark Wild Life | 10980 |
| 12815 | 3DMark Night Raid | 16274 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Tiger Lake GT2 | GPU Name | GM206 |
| Generation 12.1 | Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Intel | Foundry | TSMC |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| unknown | Transistors | 2,940 million |
| 146 mm² | Die Size | 228 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2016 |
| Iris Xe Graphics-M (Tiger Lake) | Family | Quadro (Mx000) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| Ring Bus | Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
| System Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| System Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System Shared | Memory Bus | 128 bit |
| System Dependent | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
Performance
| 26.40 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 37.22 GPixel/s |
| 52.80 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 55.82 GTexel/s |
| 1.690 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1.786 TFLOPS |
| 422.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | FP64 (double) performance | 55.82 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 300 MHz | Base Clock | 796 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock | 1163 MHz |
| System Shared | Memory Clock | 1653 MHz 6.6 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 768 | Shading Units | 768 |
| 48 | TMUs | 48 |
| 24 | ROPs | 32 |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 1024 KB |
Board Design
| IGP | Slot Width | Single-slot |
| 15 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.1 |
| 6.4 | Shader Model | 6.4 |