NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA Tesla M2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GK106 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Kepler | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 28 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 2,540 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 221 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Mar 17th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| GeForce 700A | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 10.51 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 42.05 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 1,009 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| 42.05 GFLOPS (1:24) | FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 1002 MHz 4 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 768 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 16 | ROPs | 48 |
| 16 KB (per SMX) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) |
| 256 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
Board Design
| 55 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (11_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| 1.1 | Vulkan | N/A |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 3.0 | CUDA | 2.0 |