NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Tesla C2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GF110 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Fermi 2.0 | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 40 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 3,000 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 520 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Nov 29th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| GeForce 500 | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 1280 MB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 320 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 152.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 20.50 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 40.99 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 1,312 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| 164.0 GFLOPS (1:8) | FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 950 MHz 3.8 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 732 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 448 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 56 | TMUs | 64 |
| 40 | ROPs | 48 |
| 64 KB (per SM) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SM) |
| 640 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 14 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 267 mm 10.5 inches | Length | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| 210 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| 550 W | Suggested PSU | 600 W |
| 2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (11_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 2.0 | CUDA | 2.0 |