NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA Tesla X2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GT200B | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Tesla 2.0 | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 55 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 1,400 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 470 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Nov 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| GeForce 200 | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 896 MB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 448 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 111.9 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 16.13 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 41.47 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 536.5 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| 67.07 GFLOPS (1:8) | FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Clock Speeds
| 999 MHz 1998 Mbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 576 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 216 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 72 | TMUs | 64 |
| 28 | ROPs | 48 |
| 224 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 27 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 171 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 225 W |
| 450 W | Suggested PSU | 550 W |
| 2x DVI 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 1.3 | CUDA | 2.0 |