NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 4809 | 3DMark Time Spy | 3674 |
| 2187 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 1704 |
| 10670 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 9086 |
| 5204 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 4710 |
| 2369 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 2604 |
| 31413 | 3DMark Night Raid | 31096 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| TU116 | GPU Name | Navi 14 |
| TU116-250-KA-A1 | Model number | Navi 14 ULA |
| Turing | Architecture | RDNA 1.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 6,600 million | Transistors | 6,400 million |
| 284 mm² | Die Size | 158 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2019 |
| GeForce 16 | Family | Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Mobile) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Memory
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128 bit | Memory Bus | 128 bit |
| 192.0 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s |
Performance
| 55.20 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 46.40 GPixel/s |
| 138.0 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 139.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 8.909 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| 4.416 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | FP64 (double) performance | 278.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Clock Speeds
| 1530 MHz | Base Clock | 1000 MHz |
| 1725 MHz | Boost Clock | 1450 MHz |
| 1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 1280 | Shading Units | 1536 |
| 80 | TMUs | 96 |
| 32 | ROPs | 32 |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 2 MB |
Board Design
| 100 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 85 W |
| 1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort | Display Connectors | No outputs |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 2.1 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.6 | Shader Model | 6.5 |