NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX and NVIDIA Tesla C2090. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| G92 | GPU Name | GF110 |
| Tesla | Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 40 nm |
| 754 million | Transistors | 3,000 million |
| 324 mm² | Die Size | 520 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Mar 28th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 25th, 2011 |
| GeForce 9 (9800) | Family | Tesla (x20xx) |
| End-of-life | Production | End-of-life |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
| 512 MB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256 bit | Memory Bus | 384 bit |
| 70.40 GB/s | Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s |
Performance
| 10.80 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 20.83 GPixel/s |
| 43.20 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| 432.1 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS |
Clock Speeds
| 1100 MHz 2.2 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| 675 MHz | GPU Clock | 651 MHz |
Render Config
| 128 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 64 | TMUs | 64 |
| 16 | ROPs | 48 |
| 64 KB | L2 Cache | 768 KB |
| 16 | SM Count | 16 |
Board Design
| Dual-slot | Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| 267 mm 10.5 inches | Length | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| 140 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 W |
| 300 W | Suggested PSU | 600 W |
| 2x DVI 1x S-Video | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 3.3 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 1.1 | OpenCL | 1.1 |
| N/A | Vulkan | N/A |
| 4.0 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 1.1 | CUDA | 2.0 |